In this episode of “Political Science Podcast” Marko Grdešić spoke to Branko Milanović, a research professor at the Stone Center for Socio-Economic Inequality at the City University New York, USA. The English translation of the interview transcript can be accessed here: https://analihpd.hr/en/epizoda-18-nejednakost-branko-milanovic/
U ovoj epizodi Politološkog podkasta Enes Kulenović razgovarao je s Ivom Vukušić, profesoricom međunarodne povijesti na Sveučilištu u Utrechtu i znanstvenom suradnicom na Odsjeku za ratne studije na King's College u Londonu. Razgovor se bavio suvremenim položajem institucija međunarodne pravde, njihovom ulogom u pogledu ratova u Ukrajini i Gazi, kao i gošćinim prethodnim istraživanjem paramilitarnih […]
U ovoj epizodi Politološkog podkasta naš glavni urednik Marko Grdešić razgovara s Helen Yaffe, profesoricom latinoameričke političke ekonomije na Sveučilištu u Glasgowu i dugogodišnjom istraživačicom Kube. Razgovor se bavi političkom ekonomijom Kube, njezinim povijesnim i suvremenim razvojem te ostalim temama iz gošćine knjige "Mi smo Kuba! Kako je revolucionarni narod preživio u postsovjetskom svijetu?" (Yale […]
In this episode of the Political Science Podcast, Enes Kulenović speaks with Marlene Laruelle, a professor of international relations and political science at George Washington University (USA), one of the key authors in the contemporary field of illiberalism research. The main topic of the conversation was the phenomenon of growing illiberalism in global politics, the relationship between illiberalism and liberal democracy, and the connection between illiberalism and populism.
In the fourteenth episode of the Political Science Podcast, host Višeslav Raos interviewed Bartul Vuksan-Ćusa, assistant at the Department of Croatian Politics at the Faculty of Political Science in Zagreb and a doctoral candidate at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. After discussing populism and authoritarianism, the difficulties of their conceptualization and measurement, as well as the findings about the political behavior of voters with populist attitudes in Croatia, the conversation turned to the issue of generation gap in Croatian politics...
In the thirteenth episode of the Political Science Podcast, our host Enes Kulenović interviewed Karin Doolan, Professor at the Department of Sociology at the University of Zadar. The main topic of discussion were social inequalities in the perspective of Bourdieusian class analysis, which considers classes through the prism of economic, cultural and social capital, associated with habitus and taste of agents in social fields.
In the twelfth episode, we ask ourselves - what really determines the electoral decision of Croatian voters? To get an answer to that question, in the twelfth episode, Enes Kulenović interviewed Kosta Bovan, associate professor at the Faculty of Political Science in Zagreb and an expert in political behavior, about the recent book Croatian Voters: 30 Years of Political Behavior and Opinion, which he co-edited with Danijela Širinić and Višeslav Raos.
In the eleventh episode of the Political Science Podcast, Višeslav Raos interviewed Lidija Kos-Stanišić, head of the Department of International Relations and Security Studies at the Faculty of Political Science in Zagreb, co-author of the book International Relations and Foreign Policies of the Global South: Studies of Selected Countries, written together with Đana Luša and Borna Zgurić.
In the tenth episode of the Political Science Podcast, Enes Kulenović talked with Goran Čular, associate professor of the Faculty of Political Science at the University of Zagreb and president of the Croatian Political Science Society (HPD). In the first part of the conversation, Čular spoke about the conference of the Central European Political Science Association (CEPSA) held in Dubrovnik this fall, which was hosted by HPD together with the University of Dubrovnik.
In the ninth episode of the Political Science Podcast, our host Enes Kulenović talked with Jonathan Havercroft, associate professor at the Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Southampton, about his forthcoming book Just and Unjust Riots: A Normative Analysis of Militant Protest. Can normative political theory draw a fine line between justified and unjustified violent protests? According to what criteria?
